The Predatory Hegemon: How Trump Wields American Power
-
Event Summary
AI, Health, and the Future of Scientific Cooperation
From Emerging Technology, Scientific Advancement, and Global Policy
-
Article
After Nuclear Deterrence: Insights and Uncharted Frontiers
From International Security Program
Belfer in the News
Our experts contribute to the news with critical, timely insight and perspective
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
In The News
Why Are Arctic Undersea Cables Going Regional?
-
A Letter from Belfer Center Director Meghan O'Sullivan
Upcoming Events
See what's happening at Belfer
Interest Areas
Our research spans a variety of key issues across the globe, at the nexus of science and international affairs
Tune In Every Tuesday-- Face-Off: the U.S. vs China
As the U.S.-China relationship continues to take center stage in global affairs, season 3 of Face-Off: the U.S. vs China-- the award-winning podcast-- returns to unpack the latest developments in the economies, warfare, soft power, alliances, and more between the two global superpowers.
Hosted by Jane Perlez, Belfer Center Fellow and former New York Times Beijing Bureau Chief, and Rana Mitter, Professor of Modern China History.
Available wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes release every Tuesday.
Middle East & North Africa
-
-
Event Summary
The Struggle for Democracy in the Arab World
-
Reports & Papers
Risk, Leverage, Autonomy: Turkey’s Options in a U.S.–China World
Artificial Intelligence
-
Event SummaryAI, Health, and the Future of Scientific Cooperation
From Emerging Technology, Scientific Advancement, and Global Policy
-
Reports & Papers
Code, Command, and Conflict: Charting the Future of Military AI
Energy
Science & Technology
-
Presentations
Governing Solar Radiation Management in a Rapidly Changing Arctic
From Arctic Initiative
The Rules-Based International Order: A Historical Analysis
Is the “rules-based international order” worth maintaining? In the latest issue of International Security, Marc Trachtenberg argues that historical evidence does not support those who argue “yes.” The author presents viable alternatives to the liberal international order—alternatives based on certain traditional ideas about how foreign policy should be conducted.